Monday, August 14, 2006

Reading too much into it

The Oz today has some idle speculation about potential changes in the line up of Departmental secretaries in Canberra. At the same time our friends at Crikey (again) have mentioned the fact that an article about Jane Halton in the AFR didn't ask the "hard questions".

Ignoring the hard questions piece, was the AFR piece an exercise in what the Chinese would have called "rehabilitation"? Was it really designed to see if anyone would metaphorically "mention the war".

No comments: